One of the major lessons from the past three years is that video conferencing is both convenient and annoying. However, too much of the conversation revolves around personal preferences or metrics like “productivity” that don’t translate well into a research context.
This session will explore some of the psychological and biological reasons that video conferencing isn’t just a poor substitute for in-person meetings – but rather it stands on its own merits as a qualitatively different style of interacting. Clint will also take a look at the implications for research, for stakeholder management, for productivity and for career development.
Key takeaways:
Speakers: