One of the major lessons from the past three years is that video conferencing is both convenient and annoying. However, too much of the conversation revolves around personal preferences or metrics like “productivity” that don’t translate well into a research context.
This session will explore some of the psychological and biological reasons that video conferencing isn’t just a poor substitute for in-person meetings – but rather it stands on its own merits as a qualitatively different style of interacting. Clint will also take a look at the implications for research, for stakeholder management, for productivity and for career development.
Key takeaways:
Speakers:
More sessions
Every research initiative should start with a well-defined problem or issue to be solved, that goes beyond the ever too common ‘statement of work’. Ensuring a given project delivers a [...]
By strategically implementing a multi-step research approach, Campbell’s first took the time to understand how consumers were interacting with the salty snacks category and key Campbell’s salty snacks products in-store [...]
There’s a time and place for one-time flings, but there are also a lot of upsides to a long-term relationship – in both love and research! We’ve been working together for [...]